Men Becoming Fathers in a Culture of Unbondedness
Strategies for Preventing the Nuclear Family Disaster

by
John W. Travis, MD, MPH










Modern culture is in the midst of a hidden epidemic of fathers leaving their families—usually
around the time when the first child is born.
Even if they remain in the home, men leave their
families in a multitude of ways.
Many fathers are often emotionally absent—through depression,
workaholism, violence/aggression, physical or emotional abuse, or a retreat into addiction to
substances, media, consumer goods, sports, food or sex.

Most men in the “developed” nations today never bonded (or very poorly bonded) with their
mothers. Most people don’t even notice how disconnected modern people are from each other,
compared to cultures where the bond is still intact. Yes, we talk of alienation and notice how much
people in Mediterranean cultures touch each other, but we make no connection between these
phenomena and how our bonds among people, with nature, and with the divine have been torn
asunder. I propose that this unnoticed, silent epidemic of disconnection/alienation is the source of
most societal ills. Fathers leaving their children and their families is only the tip of an iceberg.

As infants, most men in our culture have been bottle fed and subjected to other culturally-
endorsed patterns of "normative abuse", such as sleeping alone or being left to cry when their
needs weren’t met. Biologically, the male is the more fragile gender of our species and
developmentally lags years behind females—well into adulthood. Instead of getting the extra
nurturing needed to compensate for being the weaker sex, by age five, males in almost all cultures
get far less nurturing than females. It’s no surprise, then, that most of the unbonded boys in our
culture grow into men who spend a good deal of their time unconsciously seeking (and fueled by
advertising that prominently features the breasts they were denied) a mommy-figure to provide
them with the nurturing they were denied as infants/children. Part of their survival mechanism is to
learn to deny their feelings and project their unmet needs for nurturing onto substitutes, such as
women, and other externals, the most common of which are consumerism, workaholism, and other
addictions.

We unbonded men may manage pretty well in our marriages for a while, but when our “mommy”
gives birth and suddenly turns her focus toward her newborn, we usually lose much of the
nurturance we were getting from our partners. This is almost inevitable, given the state of
disconnection predominant (but taken for granted) in our culture.

The northern European cultures, in the name of civilization and progress, have been gradually
destroying the tribe/village/extended family/community for hundreds of years—replacing it with
what has become the nuclear family disaster (NFD).  This stems from a northern European
aberration in how humans organize their living arrangement, beginning with the 16th century
enclosure of the common lands. These lands were confiscated by the emerging upper class, who
then spread their control rapidly to every continent but Antarctica, first via missionaries and
territorial conquest, and now through the media and multinational corporations.   The NFD has
been gaining ground for hundreds of years, but rapidly accelerated because of the mass migration
into cities early in the last century.

This experiment in isolation and alienation, promoted in the name of ‘progress’ has immense
consequences, most obviously the overwhelming pressures on parents, particularly women, who
usually end up bearing the total responsibility of their children. Mothers cannot begin to get their
basic adult needs for nurturance and support met, unless they are one of the rare few living in a
tribe, close-knit community, or extended family.








At the same time, a father’s sudden exposure to an infant who has not yet been fully ‘trained’ in the
denial of her own needs, and is suckling at the breast, being lovingly held in arms, constantly in the
presence of her caregiver, etc.,—and readily expresses her needs, can be devastating. It will often
stir up his suppressed memories of his denied needs as an infant and plunge him into deep pain—
conscious or subconscious.

With the resulting increase in pain levels, new fathers often step up their adopted/chosen means of
defending against their feelings—via medication, having affairs, rage, depression, addiction, or
physical or emotional violence. This is the first level at which men leave. When or if the defense
mechanism fails, because the real need is not addressed, many think the only thing they can do is to
depart from the stimulus and leave their homes.

Girls in our culture also get far less nurturing than is required to optimize their well being and fully
meet their needs, and as a result often suffer a similar experience of failed bonding. They have the
opportunity, however, of recreating the experience of a secure bond through their unique ability to
bond biologically with the fetus in pregnancy. If they are able to preserve that bond by resisting the
cultural norms and raising a securely attached child,
they are often able to heal much of their
own unbondedness
, but the father’s witnessing this may simultaneously exacerbate the re-
stimulation of his own primal wounds, trigger his defenses, and increase the likeliness of his leaving.

Since depression was my defense mechanism of choice, I understand that coping mechanism better
than the others, but I believe the process I’m describing explains equally well why the other
defense mechanisms, such as addiction and violence/aggression, similarly perpetuate broken bonds
and the passing on of our trauma to the next generation.

Sourcing the Pain

I was born in the farmlands of western Ohio in 1943. Like most babies born in those days, I was
drugged (via my mother’s general anesthetic, which took weeks to wear off), dragged out of the
womb with cold, metal forceps, grasped by sticky rubber gloves, and plunged into bright lights—
instead of being gently greeted with warm hands in subdued light. I was doubtless held upside
down to drain my lungs (I’m not sure if I was slapped or not, but that was the norm of the day).
Stinging silver nitrate was put in my eyes. I was wrapped in cold, scratchy fabrics instead of being
allowed to mold my skin against the warm skin of the person with whom I’d been intimately
connected for nine months. A little while later, I was taken to the nursery where I was placed in a
plastic box beside Carol D., born earlier that day. I spent my next 10 days there (the norm for the
early ‘40s). I was given a cold, rubber nipple with a bottle of a fatty, antigenic substance instead of
the miracle food that three million years of evolution had prepared for me.

Then, a day or so later, I was immobilized on a board and the majority of the most sensitive nerve
endings of my penis were amputated. Then followed the standard “normative abuse” parenting
practices of the 1940s:

1)  artificial baby milk—probably Carnation or Pet Evaporated Milk,
2)  a four-hour bottle schedule (I got hungry every three hours and cried that last hour, until I
learned it was no use and made a decision about the world that is so basic to my brain’s neural
organization that it still impacts almost everything I do—Asking for what I want doesn’t work—my
needs will never be met.),
3)  restraint in a crib or playpen,
4)  deprivation of the continual movement of being carried in-arms,
5)  sleeping alone in a separate room.

Most of these ’improvements’ were devised by men propagating, in the name of ‘modern child
rearing practices,’ untested ‘scientific’ ideas, all of which have since been proven to be destructive
to human bonding. I don’t blame my or other parents of that age: they naturally followed the
cultural winds, and the promise of science and technology to cure the world’s ills was, in 1943, still
an untarnished vision.

From the very beginning, I used depression as my primary defense against recognizing my inability
to get my nurturing needs met. While my primary defense appears outwardly as depression—
closing down my senses and feelings by withdrawing into my head—it’s just one of a standard set
of defenses that unbonded children/adults cling to in their attempts to escape the pain of the early
needs deprivation that still eats away at them. Other defenses include addiction, violence, chronic
illness, and ecocide (destruction of the environment)—symptoms of what James Prescott named
Somato-Sensory Affectional Deprivation Syndrome (SSADS) in his early bonding research.

I created a “safe” world in my head that allowed me a sense of control (since I had no control over
being fed, touched, or held). The fact that I was disconnected from the matrix of my life by being
isolated from others, most especially my mother, limited my ability to express my needs and get
them met—hence the periodic depressions. No one recognized my depressions, including me, until
I was in college—people just thought I was “quiet.”

My condition is not atypical of most men alive today who were raised by ‘modern’ cultural
standards. One friend, though raised in California, was fortunate in that his mother was from South
America. He was breastfed well past age two and has always seemed happier than any other person
I know.

Addressing My Stroke Supply

Having never experienced a nurturing mother, I’ve subsequently spent most of my life looking for
a replacement.

I thought getting married and becoming a doctor would somehow fulfill me, so at age five I blindly
set on a course of 22 years of schooling that would handle the latter, and assumed somehow the
right “girl” would magically appear about the time I became a doctor. Although I had few social
skills, I wasn’t deterred in my belief that she would appear.

Much to my surprise, marriage midway through medical school didn’t suddenly make my life better,
just more complicated. My feelings of emptiness got worse as my depressions deepened. After
three years of marriage and several crises, my wife said we had to have a baby or split. I thought I
had to comply, since divorce wasn’t an option in my family. Reluctantly, in 1972, I became a father.

It was great at first, the excitement of a new being, but then the reality hit—I was a lot lower on my
wife’s attention list. I began to get more and more depressed, leading eventually to our getting into
therapy. There I learned I actually had feelings, and could express them, though with great
difficulty—even to this day. We began learning about the unconscious patterns we’d been playing
out in our symbiotic marriage, but seemed relatively powerless to change them. However, my
experience with this reparenting therapy group became the basis for my pioneering work in wellness
and, later, my observation that failed bonding/attachment is the primary impediment to well being
and fulfillment as an adult.

Despite learning a great deal about my inner workings, I still was depressed most of the time. When
our daughter was two and a half, the pain became so great that I realized I had to leave in order to
keep my own sanity. I was sometimes close to being suicidal. So I abandoned my first daughter,
with whom I had never really bonded—clearly out of my own inexperience with this natural
phenomenon.

The cycle began again with another intense, three-year relationship. I was still unconsciously
seeking the mommy I never had, and while I reveled in the attention I received, it wasn’t enough,
and my new partner felt drained by my neediness. It was around this time that I first heard of the
book
Magical Child and author Joseph Chilton Pearce’s efforts to reframe children’s needs for the
breast, constant presence of the mother, etc., as legitimate nurturing needs rather than mere
‘indulgences’ apt to ‘spoil’ a child. But I didn’t think it had any applicability to me. Subconsciously I
didn’t want to stir up my painful, well-repressed childhood recollections. I tried to learn to love
myself and follow the tenets of self-responsibility I was helping to promote at the time, all the
while struggling with my chronic depression. I was only marginally successful. Deep down,
something always felt wrong.

A year later I met and fell in love with an Australian, Meryn Callander. As our love blossomed, we
were often challenged in our new-forming relationship, but we managed, and a year later, married.
Meryn and I also began to work together professionally, first with authoring books, and then
creating authentic community, especially for helping professionals who are often lonely and unable
to connect with peers on an emotional level. It was through Meryn’s studies of feminist spirituality
that I became aware of the estrangement rampant throughout western culture leading to the
authoritarian institutions that surround us, like medicine, law and the educational system. I had been
struggling with aspects of this phenomenon in my work with our Wellness Resource Center the
previous seven years, but had no understanding of the bigger picture.

I thought I was gradually overcoming my depressions through continued work on myself in growth-
oriented seminars I both led and participated in. Friends who had known me a long time could see a
difference—years of hard work on painful issues were paying off.

One of the things that fed me the most was lying in bed at night in Meryn’s arms, usually watching
TV, and having my head, chest or tummy stroked. We spent an hour several nights a week, doing
that before going to sleep, and 15 minutes or so in the morning, alternating who would cradle
whom. Unlike the common male stereotype of always thinking about sex and wanting more, what I
wanted most was nurturing attention from a mother figure, though I was only dimly aware of this. I
would sometimes think something must be wrong with me for not being more sexually interested.
Being held and stroked was the lifeline that kept me going, though I didn’t fully understand how
desperate this need was until I lost most of it.

Taking the Plunge Again

Like most of our friends at the time, Meryn and I assumed we would not have children, but after 10
years, in her late 30s, Meryn’s biological alarm went off. I couldn’t imagine reopening the painful
experience of being a father again. At the urging of a friend, I read Jean Liedloff’s
The Continuum
Concept
. I suddenly saw the estrangement that we’d been studying was not innate to “the human
condition,” but a direct result of how we isolate babies and young children. Personally, I could also
see how the old wounds I thought I had handled in therapy were still there. I also thought I might
make up for my greatest failure in life (being a father) and get it “right” this time with a new
approach.

Until then, I had lived a pressured life of deadlines (self-imposed) using adrenaline to make myself
accomplish things, always feeling like some unknown but dreaded thing was gaining on me if I didn’
t have something concrete to show myself at the end of each day.
I gave lip service to focusing
on love and relationships as my highest values, but I was driven by the need to do
something to earn my keep
. This is still far truer than I would like, but in my better moments I
think I’ve made significant progress.

For four years, early in our relationship, Meryn and I lived a life of “voluntary simplicity” in the
mountains of Costa Rica. When we returned to the United States, we both longed for that simpler
life. Along with our decision to have a child, we sold our big house, cut back on the seminars we’d
been facilitating, and bought 40 acres in a remote part of Mendocino County, California, seven miles
past the end of the power lines.

We became homesteaders. I set about turning an unfinished cabin into a solar-powered home. We
read and wrote intensely on attachment parenting. We prepared to give birth to our daughter at
home with a midwife, complete with a warm water pool provided by a friend.

The birth went well, and while I thought I was now better prepared for becoming a father, I had no
idea of the depth of pain and envy that would be opened up from constantly being with someone
who knew what her needs were, expressed these needs, and got the nurturing every infant needs
and thrives on.

And, as I should have expected, Siena’s arrival supplanted much of my nurturance, but I kept busy,
as I had not yet finished the construction of our cabin on 40 remote acres of rural northern
California.

Within a week of her birth, we realized the “in-arms” attachment parenting we were attempting was
designed for an extended family, not for our NFD. Bringing Meryn’s mum over from Australia to
live with us helped, but it often seemed we still had an arms shortage—given our commitment to
Siena being “in arms” in those first months.

While we provided her with a degree of physical nurturance unknown to most children in the West
today, and she blossomed from it, our relationship got more and more strained. I went deeper into
depressions, alternating with periods of hyperactivity to keep us afloat financially and make up for
the downtime of my crashes. It was unsustainable.

I tried to meet my own needs on a number of fronts: building, men’s groups, therapy, and spending
time in nature—all to no avail.

It was only after a year of soul-searching, moving across the country to Virginia in 1996, and finding
an intentional community that appeared to fulfill many of the ideals for which we’d searched during
the previous 20 years, that I found some peace with my process and began to write about it. Despite
half a lifetime of therapy and personal growth work, I still struggle with my barely suppressed rage,
which usually shows up as depression, a chronic clenching of my jaw, and a knot in my stomach.

Even now, over eleven years since my second daughter’s arrival, I am struck by the contrast
between witnessing her needs being expressed and fully met, and how most of us were treated.
Siena was never left alone. For most of the first nine months, when she was not in Meryn’s or
Meryn’s mother’s arms, she was in mine. And I spent over 1000 nights lying in the bed near her
while she nursed.

All of this gave me a new awareness of my own subjugated oral needs around which I’ve spent my
whole life and career trying to compensate.

While being with my daughter still sometimes activates deep and painful places in me, I see her as a
spiritual teacher, challenging me to continually deal with the years of walled-in pain that keep me
disconnected from the family/tribe/planet that is my birthright.

Conclusions

My personal journey reveals just one of the many ways that failed bonding can show up in a family
dynamic. Fortunately, it’s within our wounds that our gifts may be revealed. Certainly my work in
wellness has been strongly influenced by my pain, and without seeing this in the larger perspective
of a personal journey, I think I’d have just gotten lost in the suffering. If you have not found the
gift in your own wounding, please keep looking. I believe it is there.

A word of caution: after observing myself and others who have worked with these issues for over
half of our adult lives, I am no longer certain that the childhood wounds of not having a secure
bond (or what Jean Liedloff describes as feeling worthy and welcome)—now popularized by
euphemism: low self-esteem—can be healed beyond the fast temporary relief of the latest
breakthrough therapy or confusing a newfound awareness of some aspect of the problem with a
resolution of it. Regardless, I do know we can learn to better manage our pain and be less
controlled by it. A more realistic goal of management can relieve a lot of the shame that often
results from peoples’ feeling powerless to break free of these hardwired brain circuits of fear,
anger, and depression.

Depression is currently one of the largest public health problems in our culture. This, along with
addiction, violence and chronic disease account for many of our culture’s problems—all symptoms
of failed bonding. The reactivation of this pain in our attempts to create a family of our own is a
serious condition to reflect on before the birth of a child. I had, and continue to have, a difficult
time with it, so I don’t think it’s easy for young people who naively enter into parenthood unaware
of their own wounding. Forewarned is forearmed.

To prevent perpetuating this failed bonding among our young (that is further exacerbated by
dysfunctional nuclear families—themselves an artifact of the authoritarian cultures) we need to
recognize what a secure bond looks and feels like, and begin challenging the normative abuse of
detachment parenting we see everywhere.

We see and hear these myriad symptoms of alienation and failed bonding every day in the news, but
we never hear about the real cause:
how we treat our babies and children. If we look closely, we
can see these symptoms in our own lives, understand the real cause, and begin to get our own
needs met with the support of self-awareness books and classes, support groups, therapy, and open
honest communication with our family and friends, rather than being blind to and driven by our
unmet childhood needs.

As more men become aware of the dynamics between their own unmet needs and seeing their
children’s attempts to get theirs met, the widespread denial of this problem will come out in the
open. I believe men will then be better able to comprehend, appreciate, communicate, and cope
with their issues instead of denying, hiding, inflicting them on others or medicating them—and
hopefully, their female partners and friends of both genders will better understand them. So
supported, men will then be able to help society understand and own the
wounds of
unbondedness
that have not only reached epidemic proportions in recent generations, but are also
perpetuated by cultural and economic agendas. By re-creating communities, extended families of
choice, and other as-yet-undiscovered ways of supporting each other in providing the nurturing we
never got, we can break the cycle of abandonment and separation inflicted on children in the form
of medicalized births, bottle feeding, circumcision, early day care and the like.

When we men face and accept our own wounding and when we can open our hearts to tend to our
own needs and support each other in this process, we will unleash the compassion that gives us the
strength to remain with our families and create a world that nurtures everyone.


"Jack" Travis received his medical degree from Tufts University in Boston and subsequently completed a residency
in General Preventive Medicine at Johns Hopkins University.  After several more years of training in humanistic
psychology, biofeedback, and bioenergetics, he founded the first wellness center in the world.

He and his wife, Meryn Callander, co-direct Wellness Associates, a non-profit education corporation founded in
1979 and is the author of the
Wellness Inventory, the Wellness Workbook, Wellness for Helping Professionals,
Simply Well: Choices for a Healthy Life, and A Change of Heart: The Global Wellness Inventory.  Since the
homebirth of their daughter, Siena Tierra Travis Callander in 1993 he and Meryn have turned their focus on the
wellness of infants and young children.  Together they helped found the Alliance for Transforming the Lives of
Children.  They currently reside in Australia.
It may take a village
to raise a child,
but it takes a
community to keep
the parents sane.
—Sobonfu Somé